RAPID BOLUS SINGLE-VENEPUNCTURE VERSUS TRADITIONAL TWO-VENEPUNCTURE TECHNIQUE IN MODIFIED IN-VIVO RED BLOOD CELL LABELING FOR RADIONUCLIDE VENTRICULOGRAPHY: IS THE IMAGE QUALITY ADEQUATE?

Authors

  • Charoonsak SOMBOONPORN Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
  • James WESTCOTT Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • Nouria SALEHI Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • Nathan BETTER Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • Dan Bing ZHOU Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • Krisana ROYSRI Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
  • Meir LICHTENSTEIN Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital

Keywords:

red blood cell labeling, radionuclide ventriculography, plastic catheter, image quality

Abstract

Objective: In modified in-vivo red blood cell labeling, stannous pyrophosphate is traditionally injected through a metal needle, and a plastic catheter is used to take and re-inject the blood. This is problematic in patients with needle phobia or poor veins. To eliminate one venepuncture, the percentage labeling efficiency (% LE) of a new technique was ascertained and image quality of resting radionuclide ventriculography was compared with that of the traditional technique.

Methods: TechniqueA (n=20) included rapid injection of 20-ml diluted stannous pyrophosphate through an Optiva catheter and this retained catheter was later used for taking and reinjecting the labeled blood. Technique B used a traditional small volume of the stannous agent injected by metal needle and use of an Optiva catheter to manipulate pretinned blood and subsequently reinject it.

Results: The % LE of technique A at the time before reinjection and at the end of image acquisition was 75.0%±17.9% and 86.0%±11.4%, respectively. Mean left ventricle (LV) count, background (BG) count and LV to BG count was not significantly different between the two techniques (p = 0.414, 0.944, 0.338, respectively). Eighty and 20 percent of images were graded as good and fair quality in both groups, respectively.

Conclusions: This new technique provides a high and acceptable % LE for radionuclide ventriculography but needs only single venepuncture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Shaw LJ, Heinle SK, Borges-Neto S, Kesler K, Coleman RE, Jones RH. Prognosis by measurements of left ventricular function during exercise. Duke Noninvasive Research Working Group. J Nucl Med 1998; 39: 140-6.

Callahan RJ, Froelich JW, McKusick KA, Leppo J, Strauss HW. A modified method for the in vivo labeling of red blood cells with Te-99m: concise communication. J Nucl Med 1982; 23: 315-8.

Bauer R, Haluszezynski I, Langhammer H, Bachmann W. In vivo/in vitro labeling of red blood cells with 99mTc. EurJ Nucl Med 1983; 8: 218-22.

Millar AM, Wathen CG Muir AL. Failure in labelling of red blood cells with 99mTe: interaction between intravenous cannulae an stannous pyrophosphate. Eur J Nucl Med 1983; 8: 502-4.

Cottin Y, Touzery C, Coudert B, Gilles A, Walker P, Massing JL, et al. Impairment of diastolic function during short-term anthracycline chemotherapy. Br HeartJ 1995; 73: 61-4.

Ganz WI, Sridhar KS, Ganz SS, Gonzalez R, Chakko S, Serafini A. Review of tests for monitoring doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy. Oncology 1996; 53: 461-70.

Stuckey SL, Pitman AG Hicks RJ. Cardiac blood-pool imaging in oncology more than an ejection fraction? Clin Nucl Med 2001; 26: 18-26.

Mitani I, Jain D, Joska TM, Burtness B, Zaret BL. Doxorubicin cardiotoxicity: prevention of congestive heart failure with serial cardiac function monitoring with equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography in the current era. J Nucl Cardiol 2003; 10: 132-9.

Tatum JL, Burke TS, Hirsch JI, Millar WW, Fratkin MJ. Pitfall to modified in vivo method of technetium-99m red blood cell labeling. Iodinated contrast media. Clin Nucl Med 1983; 8: 585-7.

Sampson CB. Complications and difficulties in radiolabelling blood cells: areview. Nucl Med Commun 1996; 17: 648-58.

Neumann P, Schicha H, Schumbrand P, Bahre M, Emrich D. Visualizing cardiac blood pool: comparison of three labeling methods. EurJ Nucl Med 1983; 8: 463-6.

Hambye AS, Vandermeiren R, Vervaet A, Vandevivere J. Failure to label red blood cells adequately in daily practice using an in vivo method: methodological and clinical considerations. Eur J Nucl Med 1995; 22: 61-7.

Kelly MJ, Cowie AR, Antonino A, Barton H, Kalff V. An assessment of factors which influence the effectiveness of the modified in vivo technetium-99m-erythrocyte labeling technique in clinical use. J Nucl Med 1992; 33; 2222-5.

White MP, Mann A, Cross DM, Heller GV. Evaluation of technetium-99m red blood cell labeling efficiency in adults receiving chemotherapy and the clinical impact on pediatric oncology patients. J Nucl Med Technol 1998; 26: 265-8.

Kuehne R, Reuter E. High RBC labeling efficiency by controlling pretinning with the modified in vivo/in vitro labeling method. J Nucl Med Technol 1999; 27: 222-6.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-23

How to Cite

1.
SOMBOONPORN C, WESTCOTT J, SALEHI N, BETTER N, Bing ZHOU D, ROYSRI K, et al. RAPID BOLUS SINGLE-VENEPUNCTURE VERSUS TRADITIONAL TWO-VENEPUNCTURE TECHNIQUE IN MODIFIED IN-VIVO RED BLOOD CELL LABELING FOR RADIONUCLIDE VENTRICULOGRAPHY: IS THE IMAGE QUALITY ADEQUATE?. ASEAN J Radiol [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 23 [cited 2024 Apr. 19];13(3):185-92. Available from: https://asean-journal-radiology.org/index.php/ajr/article/view/803

Issue

Section

Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.