Randomised trial on pain reduction in hysterosalpingography - a modified technique without vulsellum forceps
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46475/aseanjr.v23i3.187Keywords:
HSG, Technique, Pain, Cervical grasp, Vulsellum, Procedure durationAbstract
ABSTRACT
Background: Pain is the most common side effect of hysterosalpingography (HSG) and partly arises from vulsellum placement on the cervix and cervical traction.
Objective: To study the effect of conducting HSG without grasping the cervix with vulsellum forceps on the time taken to complete the procedure, pain experienced by the participants and diagnostic quality of HSG images produced.
Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled trial of 64 consenting adult women referred to the Radiodiagnostic department for HSG from July to December 2020 was carried out. The women were consecutively selected and randomly distributed into two groups: Group 1 - no cervical grasp and Group 2 – with cervical grasp with vulsellum forceps. HSG was done using a fluoroscopy machine, following the standard hospital protocol with speculum, Leech Wilkinson cannula and Urografin 76%. Procedure time, procedure pain using the visual analog scale and diagnostic quality of images were assessed. Data analysis was done using Microsoft Excel and SPSS software version 22.
Results: The overall mean duration of the procedure was 12.59 minutes. There was no significant difference in the procedure duration between both groups. The overall mean pain scores immediately and 15 minutes after the procedure were 4.83 and 2.23 respectively. Significant differences in pain scores were seen in the immediate post procedure 3.94 (group 1) versus 5.72 (group 2) and 15 minutes post procedure 1.75 (group 1) versus 2.72 (group 2). After adjusting for confounders, the pain score was noted to be significantly related to the HSG technique with vulsellum use associated with the higher immediate post HSG pain score. No significant difference was seen in the diagnostic image quality between group I and II
Conclusion: The elimination of vulsellum forceps during hysterosalpingography was associated with reduced pain in the immediate and 15 minutes after the procedure, without significantly increasing the procedure duration. It had no deleterious effect on the image quality.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Lawan RO, Ibinaiye PO, Onwuafua P, Hamidu A. Evaluation of Pattern of Tubo-peritoneal Abnormalities Potentially Responsible for Infertility in Zaria, Nigeria: Hysterosalpingographic Assessment. Sub-Saharan Afr J Med 2015;2:110 – 6. doi:10.4103/2384-5147.164418.
Robinson RD, Casablanca Y, Pagano KE, Arthur NA, Bates GW, Propst AM. Intracervical block and pain perception during the performance of a hysterosalpingogram: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:89-93. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000247645.52211.41.
Atalabi OM, Osinaike BB. X-ray Hysterosalpingography: the most painful part in the Nigerian woman. Afr J Anaesth Intensive Care 2011;11: 24-8. doi:10.4314/ajaic.v11i1.69133.
Medcape [Internet]. New York: WebMD; c1994-2022 [updated 2021 Sep 21; cited 2022 Nov 16]. Hysterosalpingogram Technique. Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2111999-technique#c1
Abbas AM, Abdelkadera AM, Elsayed AH, Fahmy MS. The effect of slow versus fast application of vulsellum on pain perception during copper intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2018;23:143–7.
Unlu BS, Yilmazer M, Koken G, Arioz DT, Unlu E, Baki ED, et al.Comparison of four different pain relief methods during hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled study. Pain Res Manag 2015;20:107-1. doi: 10.1155/2015/306248.
Zhong B. How to calculate sample size in randomized controlled trial? J Thorac Dis 2009;1:51-4.
Onwuchekwa CR, Oriji VK. Hysterosalpingographic (HSG) pattern of infertility in women of reproductive age. J Hum Reprod Sci 2017;10:178-84. doi:10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_121_16.
Eduwem DU, Akintomide AO, Bassey DE, Ekott MI. Hysterosalpingographic patterns and relevance in the management of infertility in a Nigerian tertiary health Institution. Asian J Med Sci 2016;7:70-4.
Omidiji OA, Toyobo OO, Adegbola O, Fatade A, Olowoyeye OA. Hysterosalpingographic findings in infertility – what has changed over the years? Afr Health Sci2019;19:1866-74. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i2.9.
Toufig H, Benameur T, Twfieg ME, Omer H, El-Musharaf T. Evaluation of hysterosalpingographic findings among patients presenting with infertility. Saudi J Biol Sci 2020;27:2876-82. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.041.
Obajimi G, Ogunkinle B. Routine saline infusion sonohysterography prior to assisted conception: a review of our initial experience. Ann Ib Postgrad Med 2016;14:99-102.
Allison SJ, Horrow MM, Kim HY, Lev-Toaff AS. Saline-infused Sonohysterography: Tips for achieving greater success. Radiographics 2011;31:1991-2004. doi: 10.1148/rg.317115074
UCSF Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging [Internet]. San Fancisco: UCSF; 2022 [cited 2022 Mar 29]. How to prepare for a Hysterosalpingogram (HSG) procedure. Available from: https://radiology.ucsf.edu/patient-care/prepare/hysterosalpingogram.
Radiologyinfo.org for patients [Internet]. RSNA; 2022 [cited 2022 Mar 29]. Hysterosalpingography. Available from:https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info/hysterosalp.
Costantini-Ferrando MF.What should I expect during a Hysterosalpingogram HSG Test?. 2022 [cited 2022 Mar 29]. In: RMA Location Doctors Education Science Resources Blog [Internet]. RMA Network. [2022]. Available from: https://rmanetwork.com/blog/expect-hysterosalpingogram-hsg/.
Kahyaoglu S, Yumusak OH, Kahyaoglu I, Kucukbas GN, Esercan A, Tasci Y. Evaluation of time lapse for establishing distal tubal occlusion diagnosis during hysterosalpingography procedure performed by using water soluble contrast media. J Chinese Med Assoc 2017;80:313-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2016.09.006.
Handelzalts JE, Levy S, Peled Y, Binyamin L, Wiznitzer A, Goldzweig G, et al. Information seeking and perceptions of anxiety and pain among women undergoing hysterosalpingography. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;202:41-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.037.
Jain S, Inamdar DB, Majumdar A, Jain DK. Effectiveness of paracervical block for pain relief in women undergoing hysterosalpingography. J Hum Reprod Sci 2016;9:230-5. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.197643.
Liberty G, Gal M, Mazaki E, Eldar-Geva T, Vatashsky E, Margalioth EJ. Pain relief of hysterosalpingography by prior uterine cervical application of lidocaine/prilocaine cream. Fertil Steril 2005;84(Suppl 1):127–8.
Ahmad G, Duffy J, Watson AJ. Pain relief in hysterosalpingography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;18:CD006106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006106.pub2.
Robinson RD, Casablanca Y, Pagano KE, Arthur NA, Bates GW, Propst AM. Intracervical block and pain perception during the performance of a hysterosalpingogram: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:89–93. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000247645.52211.41.
Anserini P, Delfino F, Ferraiolo A, Remorgida V, Menoni S, De Caro G. Strategies to minimize discomfort during diagnostic hysterosalpingography with disposable balloon catheters: A randomised placebo controlled study with oral nonsteroidal premedication. Fertil Steril 2008;90:844–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1302.
Tur-Kaspa I, Seidman DS, Soriano D, Greenberg I, Dor J, Bider D. Hysterosalpingography with a balloon catheter versus a metal cannula: a prospective, randomized, blinded comparative study. Human Reprod 1998;13:75–7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.1.75.
Ayida G, Kennedy S, Barlow D, Chamberlain P. A comparison of patient tolerance of hysterosalpingography-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) with Echovist-200 and X-ray hysterosalpingography for outpatient investigation of infertile women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;7:201–4. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07030201.x.
Ricci G, Guastalla P, Ammar L, Cervi G, Guarnieri S, Sartore A. Balloon catheter vs. cervical vacuum cup for hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. Fertil Steril 2007;87:1458-67.doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.096.
Lindheim SR, Sprague C, Winter TC 3rd. Hysterosalpingography and Sonohysterography: Lessons in Technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:24–9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.05.0836.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The ASEAN Journal of Radiology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Disclosure Forms and Copyright Agreements
All authors listed on the manuscript must complete both the electronic copyright agreement. (in the case of acceptance)
