ACCURACY OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY COMPARED TO UNENHANCED HELICAL COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY IN SCREENING OF SMALL KIDNEY STONES IN A COMMUNITY

Authors

  • Amorn PREMGAMONE Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
  • Eim-on MAIRIANG Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
  • Pote SRIBOONLUE Department of Biochemistry. Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
  • Petcharakorn HANPANICH Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
  • Wattana DITSATAPORNCHAROEN Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University

Keywords:

hyperechoic foci, small kidney stone, unenhanced helical computed tomography, microhematuria, micropyuria

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography for screening of small kidney stone by comparison with unenhanced helical computerized helical tomography (UHCT). Our community in the North-Easthern part of Thailand have a prevalence of kidney stone which is the main public health problem. Our ultrasonography (US) survey found a prevalence of hyperechoic (H YF) with or without acoustic shadowing mimicing with small kidney stones (KS). Since small stone is relatively easy to manage but difficult to be diagnosed. It will be most beneficial to study this project in order to be able to manage the kidney stones in the epidermic area since the stones are still small and easier to be managed.

METHOD: Participants were 164 subjects (328 kidneys) randomly sampled from our community survey, with and without HYF in 118 and 210 kidneys, respectively. Within 48 hours, the subjects were transferred to the university hospital for UHCT by the radiologists.

RESULT: By comparison with UHCT, the sensitivity and specificity of US in screening for KS was 81.1% and 72.7%. The respective sensitivity and specificity of microhematuria and micropyuria were 53.7% and 57.9%, and 36.6% and 52.9%.

CONCLUSION: The screening of small kidney stones by US in community had moderate sensitivity and specificity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Sriboonlue P, Prasongwatana V, Chata K, Tungsanga K. Prevalence of upper urinary tract stone disease in a rural community of north-eastern Thailand. Br. J. Urol. 1992; 69: 240-4.

Premgamone A, Khantikaew N, Kessomboon P. Prevalence of nephrolithiasis in three districts of Khon Kaen province using the mobile ultrasound unit. Srinagarind Med. J. 1995; 10: 272-86.

Yanagawa M, Kawamura J, Onishi T, et al. Incidence of urolithiasis in northeast Thailand. Int. J. Urol. 1997; 4: 537-40.

Aimpetcharapong C, Chuasatuchon C, Pongsapritr N. Prevalcence of urinary tract stone in rural communities in north-east Thailand: A research reported to the Ministry of Public Health. 1994.

Middleton WD, Dodds WJ, Lawson TL, Foley WD. Renal calculi: sensitivity for detection with US. Radiology 1988; 167: 239-44.

Vrtiska TJ, Hattery RR, King BF, etal. Role of ultrasound in medical management of patients with renal stone disease. Urol. Radiol. 1992: 14: 131-8.

Abramson S, Walders N, Applegate KE, Gilkeson RC, Robbin MR. Impact in the emergency department of unenhanced CT on diagnostic confidence and therapeutic efficacy in patients with suspected renal colic: a prospective survey. AJR 2000; 175: 1689-95.

Katz DS, Lane MJ, Sommer FG Non-contrast spiral CT of patients with suspected renal colic. Eur Radiol 1997; 7: 680-5.

Smith RC, Varanelli M. Diagnosis and management of acute ureterolithiasis: CT is truth. AJR 2000; 175: 3 -6.

Bovornpadungkitti S, Snboonlue P, Tungsanga K. Post operative renal stone recurrence in Khon Kaen Regional Hospital. Thai J. Urol. 1992; 13: 21-6.

Motola JA, Smith AD. Therapeutic options for the management of upper tract calculi. Urol. Clin. North Am. 1990; 17: 191-206.

Ahmed NA, Ather MH, Rees J: Unenhanced helical computed tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Int J Urol 2003. 10: 287- 292.

O'Flynn JD. The treatment of ureteric stones: report on 1120 patients. Br. J. Urol. 1980; 52: 436-8.

Sinclair D, Wilson S, Toi A, Greenspan L. The evaluation of suspected renal colic: ultrasound scan versus excretory urography. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1989; 18: 556-9.

Aslaksen A, Gothlin JH. Ultrasonic diagnosis of ureteral calculi in patients with acute flank pain. Eur. J. Radiol. 1990; 11: 87-90.

Deyoe LA, Cronan JJ, Breslaw BH, Ridlen MS. New techniques of ultrasound and color Doppler in the prospective evaluation of acute renal obstruction. Do they replace the intravenous urogram? Abdom. Imaging 1995; 20: 58-63.

Sudah M, Vanninen RL, Partanen K, et al. Patients with acute flank pain: comparison of MR urography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology. 2002; 223: 98-105.

Pearle MS, Watamull LM, Mullican MA. Sensitivity ofnon-contrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol. 1999; 162: 23-6.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-27

How to Cite

1.
PREMGAMONE A, MAIRIANG E- on, SRIBOONLUE P, HANPANICH P, DITSATAPORNCHAROEN W. ACCURACY OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY COMPARED TO UNENHANCED HELICAL COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY IN SCREENING OF SMALL KIDNEY STONES IN A COMMUNITY. ASEAN J Radiol [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 27 [cited 2025 Jan. 31];14(2):127-34. Available from: https://asean-journal-radiology.org/index.php/ajr/article/view/825

Issue

Section

Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.