Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography for acute appendicitis: Comparison among in-training, junior, and senior radiologists

Authors

  • Puwitch Charoenchue, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand 50200
  • Nartanong Jaijina, M.D. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Department of Radiology, Srisangwan Hospital, Mae Hong Son, Thailand.
  • Suwalee Pojchamarnwiputh, M.D. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand 50200
  • Natipat Jitmahawong, M.D. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand 50200
  • Amonlaya Amantakul, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand 50200

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46475/asean-jr.v27i3.1026

Keywords:

Acute appendicitis, Computed tomography, Diagnostic accuracy, Experience, Radiology training

Abstract

Background: Computed tomography (CT) is widely used for diagnosing acute appendicitis, but the impact of radiologist experience on diagnostic accuracy remains unclear. This study compares the diagnostic performance of in-training, junior, and senior radiologists to assess whether experience influences accuracy and interobserver agreement.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective study analyzed CT scans of 196 patients suspected of having acute appendicitis from January to December 2020. Three radiologists—in training, junior, and senior—interpreted the scans independently. The diagnostic performance of each reader was compared based on pathological or clinical follow-up. Diagnostic accuracy indices were calculated for each reader, and interobserver agreement was assessed.

Results: CT demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy across all reader groups. The senior radiologist achieved the highest accuracy (94.4%; 95% CI, 90.2-97.2), followed by the junior radiologist (93.9%; 95% CI, 89.5-96.8) and the in-training radiologist (91.3%; 95% CI, 86.5-94.9), with no statistically significant differences. The AUROC values were 0.944 for the senior radiologist, 0.938 for the junior radiologist, and 0.912 for the in-training radiologist. Interobserver agreement was excellent, with Fleiss’ kappa of 0.864 (95% CI, 0.806-0.921).

Conclusion: CT showed high diagnostic performance for acute appendicitis across different levels of radiologist experience in this cohort. Junior and senior radiologists demonstrated slightly higher numerical accuracy than the in-training radiologist, mainly due to fewer false-negative interpretations. These findings suggest comparable CT diagnostic results among in-training, junior, and senior radiologists, while emphasizing the importance of careful assessment of subtle or atypical cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Von Titte SN, McCabe CJ, Ottinger LW. Delayed appendectomy for appendicitis: Causes and consequences. Am J Emerg Med 1996;14:620–2. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90074-1.

Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V. Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: Study period 1993-2008. J Surg Res 2012;175:185–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.017.

Guan L, Liu Z, Pan G, Zhang B, Wu Y, Gan T, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of appendicitis in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: A systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. BMC Gastroenterol 2023;23:44. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02678-7.

Kariya A, Krutsri C, Singhatas P, Sumritpradit P, Thampongsa T, Lertsitthichai P, et al. Incidence of complicated appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg Open 2022;45:100512. doi: 10.1016/j.ijso.2022.100512.

Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 1986;15:557–64. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80993-3.

Ohle R, O'Reilly F, O'Brien KK, Fahey T, Dimitrov BD. The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: A systematic review. BMC Med 2011;9:139. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-139.

Kinesya E, Cintya EP, Dorothy MJ, Ennaidi NN, Rusti HF, Mannagalli Y, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado score components in patients with appendicitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis approach. Health Sci Rev 2022;2:100018. doi: 10.1016/j.hsr.2022.100018.

Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA, Clautice-Engle TL, Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB Jr. Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:405–9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016216.

Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS. Suspected acute appendicitis: Nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 1999;213:341–6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv44341.

Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, McCabe CJ, Lawrason JN, Berger DL, et al. Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: Prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 1997;202:139–44. doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988203.

Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, Lawrason JN, McCabe CJ. Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1275–80. doi: 10.2214/ajr.169.5.9353441.

Bakker OJ, Go PM, Puylaert JB, Kazemier G, Heij HA; Werkgroep richtlijn Diagnostiek en behandeling van acute appendicitis. [Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: Imaging prior to appendectomy is recommended]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2010;154:A303.

Smith MP, Katz DS, Lalani T, Carucci LR, Cash BD, Kim DH, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria(R) right lower quadrant pain--suspected appendicitis. Ultrasound Q 2015;31:85–91. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000118.

Wazzan M, Abduljabbar A, Khizindar H, Alzahrani A, Aljohani RM, Nahas R, et al. Up-to-Date diagnostic CT standards for acute appendicitis: Wall thickness and intraluminal fluid thickness. Cureus 2023;15:e48154. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48154.

Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA. Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: Experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:686–92. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199709000-00002.

Yang HK, Ko Y, Lee MH, Woo H, Ahn S, Kim B, et al. Initial performance of radiologists and radiology residents in interpreting low-dose (2-mSv) appendiceal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205:W594–611. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14513.

Hunter TB, Taljanovic MS, Krupinski E, Ovitt T, Stubbs AY. Academic radiologists' on-call and late-evening duties. J Am Coll Radiol 2007;4:716–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.06.012.

Lietzen E, Salminen P, Rinta-Kiikka I, Paajanen H, Rautio T, Nordstrom P, et al. The accuracy of the computed tomography diagnosis of acute appendicitis: Does the experience of the radiologist matter? Scand J Surg 2018;107:43–7. doi: 10.1177/1457496917731189.

Strub WM, Vagal AA, Tomsick T, Moulton JS. Overnight resident preliminary interpretations on CT examinations: Should the process continue? Emerg Radiol 2006;13:19–23. doi: 10.1007/s10140-006-0498-4.

Levine CD, Aizenstein O, Lehavi O, Blachar A. Why we miss the diagnosis of appendicitis on abdominal CT: Evaluation of imaging features of appendicitis incorrectly diagnosed on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:855–9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.3.01840855.

Cho J, Kim HY, Lee S, Park JH, Lee KH. Radiology residents' independent diagnosis of appendicitis using 2-mSv computed tomography: A secondary analysis of a large pragmatic randomized trial. Korean J Radiol 2023;24:529–40. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2023.0015.

Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging; Kambadakone AR, Santillan CS, Kim DH, Fowler KJ, Birkholz JH, Camacho MA, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria® right lower quadrant pain: 2022 update. J Am Coll Radiol 2022;19(11S):S445–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.011.

Rud B, Vejborg TS, Rappeport ED, Reitsma JB, Wille‐Jørgensen P. Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019:CD009977. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009977.pub2.

Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Augustin G, Gori A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 2020;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

1.
Charoenchue P, Jaijina N, Pojchamarnwiputh S, Jitmahawong N, Amantakul A. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography for acute appendicitis: Comparison among in-training, junior, and senior radiologists. ASEAN J Radiol [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 30 [cited 2026 Oct. 1];27(3):277-98. Available from: https://asean-journal-radiology.org/index.php/ajr/article/view/1026

Issue

Section

Original Article

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.