THE EFFECT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM OF THE COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM

Authors

  • Petcharleeya SUWANPRADIT Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
  • Anchali KRISANACHINDA Department of Radiology, Chulalongkorn University
  • Sukalaya LERDLUM Department of Radiology, Chulalongkorn University
  • Kiat ARJHANSIRI Department of Radiology, Chulalongkorn University
  • Weeranuch KITSUKJIT Department of Radiology, Chulalongkorn University

Keywords:

Quality control program, computed radiography

Abstract

Objectives: To study the relationship between the patient radiation doses, the image quality and the repeated and rejected rates both before and after the implementation of the quality control (QC) program to the computed radiography (CR) system at the Outpatient Division, Department of Radiology of King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society.

Materials: Two systems of single-phase x-ray machine (Hitachi model DR-155HM), and another system of the CR system (Fuji model FCR 5000) with standard type of imaging plates, QC accessories, CR workstation with high resolution display system were compared.

Methods: Experimental prospective study, before and after QC program to the CR system were designed; 1,384 examinations of the adult patients, eight projections of CR images, skull PA, lateral cephalometry, cervical spine AP, chest PA, abdomen AP, lumbo-sacral spine AP and lateral and pelvis AP were performed under patient consent form and calculated the entrance skin dose (ESD). The radiographic patient dose was defined as the comparison of the rejected and retaken rates for the before and after QC of equipment. CR image quality evaluation had been done by two of the equivalent experienced radiologists.

Results: There were the significantly differences (P < 0.05) for the decreasing of the rejected and retaken rate and the decreasing of average of ESD after the implementation of the QC program of the CR system.

Conclusion: After the implementation of quality control program for the computed radiography system, the reduction of the rejected and retaken rate was 55 percent and the reduction of the entrance skin dose was 18 percent in PA chest and 16 percent in the lumbo-sacral spines while maintaining optimum image quality. The QC program of the CR system shows the useful parameters benefited for the optimization of the patient doses and the image quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Willis CE. 10 Fallacies about CR. Journal of Imaging Technology Management December 2002: 1-6.

Reiner B, Siegel E. Putting the quality back into QA without the headaches. insights & images 2003: 5-8.

Williams J.R, Catling MK. Short communication, An Investigation of x-ray equipment factors influencing patient dose in radiography. BJR 1998; 71: 1192-8.

Polunin N, Lim TA, Tan, KP. Reduction in retake rate and radiation dosage through computed radiography. Annual Academy of Medicine, November 1998; 27(6): 805-7.

Artz DS. Computed radiography for radiological technologists. Semin Roentgenol 1997; 32: 12-24.

Weatherburn GC, Bryan S, West M. A comparison of image reject rates when using film, hard copy computed radiography and soft copy imaged on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) workstations. BJR 1999; 72: 653-60.

Murphet MD, Quale JL, Martin NL, Bramble JM, Cook LT, Dwyer SJ. Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging. AJR AmJ Roentgenol 1992;158:19-27.

Bowman JE. The future is now: digital radiography. Bytes Imaging's Future 1998; 30: 12-5.

Weatherburn GC, Bryan S, Davies JG. Comparison of doses for bedside examinations of the chest with conventional screen-film and computed radiography: results ofa randomized controlled trial. Radiology 2000; 217: 707-12.

Cesar LJ, Schueler BA, Zink FE, Daly TR, Taubel JP, Jorgenson LL. Artifacts found in computed radiography. BJR 2001; 74: 195- 202.

Committee 3 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: Review and additional advice, 2001.

Clark RH, Dunster HJ, Guskova AK, et al. Annual of the ICRP publication 60. 2nd ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1991.

Pasad. Report of Radiographic System Performance. ENH 2000:1-6.

Seibert JA, Bogucki TM, Ciona T, et al. Acceptance testing and quality control of photo stimulable phosphor imaging systems report of Task Group 10 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AAPM Task Group 10 version 3.1, October 1997:1-56.

Protocol for the QA of Computed Radiography System Commissioning and Annual QA Tests, KCARE CR QA Protocol Draft 4.0. Kings College Hospital, March 2003: 1-14.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-27

How to Cite

1.
SUWANPRADIT P, KRISANACHINDA A, LERDLUM S, ARJHANSIRI K, KITSUKJIT W. THE EFFECT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM OF THE COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM. ASEAN J Radiol [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 27 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];14(2):79-92. Available from: https://asean-journal-radiology.org/index.php/ajr/article/view/820

Issue

Section

Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.