ROLE OF CONTRAST MR MAMMOGRAPHY IN THE INDETERMINATED BREAST DISEASES

Authors

  • Darunee BOONJUNWETWAT Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
  • Saowanee SRIRATTANAPONG Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
  • Pichet SAMPATANUKUL Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
  • Kris CHATAMRA Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkom University

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic capability of contrast MR mammography (MRM) in the problem of breast lesions that were indeterminated on mammography and ultrasonography.

The contrast MRM of twenty - two proven breast lesions was retrospectively reviewed. All lesions were indeterminated on mammography and sonography. There were eight cases received conserving breast treatment for carcinoma. The contrast MRM was performed by GE Signa 1.5 Tesla system. Only nine cases had post contrast dynamic study with signal time curve. All lesions were read and concensus by two radiologists using the same criteria based on MR morphologic features, patterns of enhancement and signal time curve. The qualitative and quantitative studies were integrated into the five points confidence scale (MRI score). The lesions were graded benign or malignant according to the MRI score (1,2 = benign and 3,4,5 = malignant). Furthermore, we analyzed the data of these lesions into two groups, group 1 without signal time curve and group 2 with signal time curve.

Twenty - two lesions were interpreted by using the MRI score, seven lesions were considered to be malignant and fifteen lesions were considered to be benign. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the diagnosis of breast disease were 75%, 92.8%, and 86.4% respectively. In comparison between the group | and group 2, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in diagnosis were 60.0%, 80.0%, 70.0% in group 1 and 100%, 100%, 100% in group 2, respectively.

Contrast MRM is the effective imaging method for evaluation of the breast lesions that mammography and sonography were indeter-minated. Supplement dynamic study with signal time curve should improve the capability and provide superiority in establishing the correct diagnosis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Sardanelli F, Melani E, Ottonelio C, Parodi RC, Imperiale A, Massa T, Parodi GC, Canavese G. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast in characterizing positive or uncertain mammographic findings. Cancer detection and prevention 1998;22 (1):39-42.

Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Obrist P, Dunser M. Value of MR tomography in inconclusive mammography findings. Radiologe 1997;37(9):702-9.

Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Kuchler C. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. European Journal of Radiology 1997;24(2):94-108.

Murray AD, Redpath TW, Needham G, Gilbert FJ, Brookes JA, Eremin O. Dynamic magnetic resonance mammography of both breasts following local excision and radiotherapy for breast carcinoma. The British Journal of Radiology 1996;69:594-600.

Rieber A, Merkle E, Zeitler H, Gorich J, Kreienberg R, Brambs HJ, Tomezak R. Value of MR mammography in the detection and exclusion of recurrent breast carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21(5): 780-784.

Lewis-Jones HG, Whitehouse GH, Leinster SJ. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of local recurrent breast carcinoma. Clinical Radiology 1991;43:197-204.

Dao TH, Rahmouni A, Campana F, Laurent M, Asselain B, Fourquet A. Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the irradiated breast: differentiation with dynamic _gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1993;187:751-755.

Humtaz H, Davidson T, Hall-craggs MA, payley M, Walmsley K, Cowley G, Taylor I. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and conventional tripple assessment in locally recurrent breast cancer. British Journal of Surgery 1997; 84:1147-1151.

Obdeijn IM, Kuijpers TJ, Van DP, Wiggers T, oudkerk M. MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1996;6(6): 849-54.

Drew PJ, Kerin MJ, Turnbull LW, Imrie M, Carletom PJ, Fox JN, Manson JR. Routine screening for local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Annals of Surgical Oncology 1998;5(3): 265-70.

Davis PL, McCarty KS Jr. Sensitivity of enhanced MRI for the detection of breast cancer: new, multicentric, residual, and recurrent. European Radiology 1997;7 suppl 5:289-98.

Fisher U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrastenhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999;213(3):881-888.

Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H, Krischke I, Eiermann W, Bassermann R, Lissner J. MR imaging of the breast using Gadolinium-DTPA. J Computer Assist Tomogr 1986;10(2):199-204.

Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, Schild HH. Dynamic breast MR imaging: Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesion? Radiology 1999;211(1): 101-110.

Holden A, anderson JE, Ives FJ, Taylor D, Wylie EJ, Adamson R. Breast MRI: early experience with a 3-D fat-suppressed gradient echo sequence in the evaluation of breast lesions. Australian Radiology 1996;40(4):391-7.

Hulka CA, Smith BL, Sgroi DC, Tan L, Edmister WB, Semple JP, Campbell T, Kopans DB, Brady TJ, Weisskoff RM. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1995;197:33-38.

Kerslake RW, Fox JN, Carleton PJ, Imrie MJ, Cook AM, Bowsley SJ, Horsman A. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and fat suppressed MR imaging in suspected recurrent carcinoma of the breast: preliminary experience. The British Journal of Radiology 1994;67(804):1158-1168.

Mussurkis S, Ruckley DL, Coady AM, Turnbull LW, Horsman A. Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced RMI of the breast. The British Journal of Radiology 1996;69(827):1009- 1016.

Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Hochman MG, Langlotz CP, Reynolds CA, Torosian MH. Breast MR imaging: Interpretation modell. Radiology 1997; 202:833-841.

Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions; MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994;190:485-493.

Dash N, Lupetin AR, Daffner RH, Deeb ZL, Sefezek RJ, Schapiro RL. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast disese. AJR 1986;146:119-125.

El Yousef SJ, O’Connell DM, Duchesneau RH, Smith MJ, Hubay CA, Guyton SP. Benign and malignant breast disease: magnetic resonance and radiofrequency pulse sequences. AJR 1985;145:1-8.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-13

How to Cite

1.
BOONJUNWETWAT D, SRIRATTANAPONG S, SAMPATANUKUL P, CHATAMRA K. ROLE OF CONTRAST MR MAMMOGRAPHY IN THE INDETERMINATED BREAST DISEASES. ASEAN J Radiol [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 13 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];7(2):97-106. Available from: https://asean-journal-radiology.org/index.php/ajr/article/view/560

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2001): May-August

Section

Original Article

License

Copyright (c) 2023 The ASEAN Journal of Radiology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Disclosure Forms and Copyright Agreements
All authors listed on the manuscript must complete both the electronic copyright agreement. (in the case of acceptance)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>