SONOGRAPHICALLY GUIDED HYDROSTATIC REDUCTION OF CHILDHOOD INTUSSUSCEPTION IN UTTARADIT HOSPITAL

Authors

  • Kanda SAKSORNCHAI X-ray department, Uttaradit Hospital, Naresuan University

Abstract

Over 10-year period, real-time ultrasound (US) were performed in 33 intussusceptions (32 cases). 21 cases were undergone immediate reduction procedure after the diagnosis. The reductions were performed under US-guided using normal saline as enema fluid under pressure control of 80-110 mmHg. The height of the enema bag is about 3 feet above the table top as usual. 4 cases were successfully reduced. Complete reductions could not be confirmed in another 3 cases but follow up revealed complete recovery. 14 cases were operated. 12/14 operated cases underwent manual reductions and 2/14 got bowel resections. Surgical findings were as followed: 1 gangrenous bowel,1 polyp in the terminal ileum,1 inflamed appendix, 3 ileo-ileocolic intussusceptions, 3 ischemic changes, 4 long intussusceptions, 4 small residual intussusceptions and 1 negative for intussusception (more than one findings in one case).

Success rate of reduction is 19.05% (n=21). Factors influencing incomplete reductions were poor general conditions, massive rectal bleeding, small bowel obstruction and rectal-sealed problem.

Potential improvement can be made to achieve better result. The seal problem can be avoided by inflation of the Foley's balloon and controlling the reduction time not longer than 15 minutes. The poor general conditions should be improved prior reduction attempted. Although this method has not yet been shown to be as good as those conventional ones, the obvious benefits are radiation free effect and being more friendly to the atmosphere. Sonogram is operator dependent and the US-guided saline enema reduction needs time for learning curve to become more accepted procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

John R. Sty, MD; Robert G. Wells. MD; Robert J. Starshak, MD; David C. Gregg, MD. Diagnostic Imaging of Infants and Children: Aspen Publishers, Inc 1992 P 187-190.

Hutchinson IF, Olayiwola B, Young DG. Intussusception in infancy and childhood. Br J Surg. 1980; 67: 209-212.

Ein SH, Stephens CA. Intussusception: 354 cases in 10 years, J Pediatr Surg. 1971;6: 16-27.

Richard I, Markowitz, MD. James S. Meyer MD. Pneumatic versus hydrostatic Reduction of intussusceptions. Radiology 1992; 183: 623-624.

Seong Ku Woo, MD. Jung Sik Kim, MD. Tae Won Paik, MD. Soon Ok Choi, MD. Childhood intussusception: US-guided hydrostatic reduction Radiology 1992; 182: 77-80.

Thomas W. Riebel, MD. Rohangiz Nasir, MD. Kerstin Weber MD. US-guided hydrostatic Reduction of intussusception in children. Radiology 1993; 188: 513-516.

Kim YG, Choi BI, Yeon KM, Kim CW. Diagnosis and treatment of Childhood intussusception using real-time ultrasonography and saline enema: preliminary report. J Korean Soc Med Ultrasound 1982; 1: 66-70.

Bolia AA. Case report: diagnosis and hydrostatic reduction of an intussusception under ultrasound guidance. Clin Radiol 1985; 655-657.

Wang GD, Liu SJ. Enema reduction of intussusception by hydrostatic pressure under ultrasound guidance: a report of 377 cases. J. Pediatr Surg 1988; 23: 814-818.

Yoon CH, Kim HS Ultrasound guided reduction of childhood intussusception. J Korean Radiol Soc 1986; 22: 788-793.

Kruatrachue A, Wongtapradit L, Nithipanya N, Ratanaprakarn W. Result of Air Enema Reduction of Intussusception at Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health (Children's Hospital) since 1992-2001.

Swischuk LE, Hayden CK Jr, Boulden T. Intussusception: indications for ultrasonography and an explanation of the doughnut and pseudo -kidney sign. Pediatr Radiol 1985; 15: 388-391.

Tran-Minh VA, Praeros JP, Massard PE, Louis D, Pacross-Deffrenne P. Diagnosis of acute intestinal intussusception (All) by realtime ultrasonography: evaluation in 176 children with symptoms suspicious for All (Abstr). Pediatr Radiol 1985; 15: 267-268.

Bisset GS III, Kirks DR. Intussusception in infants and children: diagnosis and therapy. Radiology 1988; 168: 141-145.

Verschelden P, Filiatrault D, Garel L, et al. Intussusception in children: reliability of US in diagnosis-a prospective study. Radiology 1992; 184: 741-744.

Woo SK, Kim JS, Suh SJ, Paik TW, Choi SO. Childhood intussusception: US-guided hydrostatic reduction. Radiology 1992; 182: 77-80.

Riebel TW, Nasir R, Weber K. US-guided hydrostatic reduction of tntussusception in children. Radiology 1993; 188: 513-516.

Swischuk LE, John SD, Swischuk PN. Spontaneous reduction of intussusception: verification with US. Radiology 1994; 192: 269-271.

Gloria del-Pozo, MD., Jose C. Albillos, MD., Daniel tejedor, MD., Rosa Calero, MD., Miguel Rasero, MD., Urbano de-la-Calle, MD., UIpiano Lopez-Pacheco, MD. Intussusception in Children: Current Concept in diagnosis and Enema Reduction. Radiographic 1999; 19: 299-319

Downloads

Published

2023-04-23

How to Cite

1.
SAKSORNCHAI K. SONOGRAPHICALLY GUIDED HYDROSTATIC REDUCTION OF CHILDHOOD INTUSSUSCEPTION IN UTTARADIT HOSPITAL. ASEAN J Radiol [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 23 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];13(2):111-8. Available from: https://asean-journal-radiology.org/index.php/ajr/article/view/793

Issue

Section

Original Article