DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF ULTRASONOMETER FOR EVALUATION OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN

Authors

  • Somsri UARATANAWONG Nuclear Division, Department of Radiology, BMA Medical College and Vajira Hospital
  • Somchai UARATANAWONG Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, BMA Medical College and Vajira Hospital
  • Varodom BOONYAVISUT Nuclear Division, Department of Radiology, BMA Medical College and Vajira Hospital

Keywords:

Osteoporosis, Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, Quantitative ultrasound

Abstract

Objects: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of quantitative ultrasound (QUS)
Study design: A diagnostic test (Cross-sectional descriptive study)
Methods: 324 postmenopausal women were evaluated for bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at Nuclear Medicine Division, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration and Vajira Hospital from January 2003-November 2004. BMDs were interpreted as osteoporosis by WHO criteria. The speed of sound (SOS) was also measured at the distal third of radius by quantitative ultrasound (QUS).
Results: The prevalence of osteoporosis in our study was 30.8%, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and positive likelihood ratio were 62%, 91.5%, 76.5%, 84.4% and 7 respectively.
Conclusion: SOS measurement at the distal third of radius by QUS had moderate sensitivity, but had high specificity when use DEXA as a gold standard and use WHO T-score as a reference. The highly specific test has been useful to confirm a diagnosis that has been suggested JAN. - APR. 2005. Volume XI Number! by other clinical data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Anonymous 1993 Consensus Development Conference: Diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 1993; 94:646-50.

Cooper C,Campion G, Melton LJ. Hip fractures in the elderly: worldwide projection. Osteoporos Int 1992;2: 258-89.

Kellie SE. Diagnostic and therapeutic technology assessment (DATTA). JAMA 1992; 267: 286-8, 290-4.

Njeh CF, Boivin CM, Langton CM. The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: areview. Osteoporosis Int 1997;7:7-22.

Gluer CC. Quantitative ultrasound techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis: expert agreement on current status. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 1280-8.

Greenspan SL, Bouxsein Ml, Melton ME, Kolodny AH,Clair JH, Delucca PT, et al. Pricision and discriminatory ability of calcaneal bone assessment technologies. J Bone Miner Res 1997 ;12:1303-14

Kaufman JJ, Einhorn TA. Perspectives ultrasound assessment of bone.J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:517-25

Brunader R, Shelton DK. Radiologic bone assessment in the evaluation of osteoporosis. Am Fam Physician 2002; 1:1357-64.

Daragon A, Krzanowska K, Vittecoq O, Menard JF, Hau I, Jouen-Beades F, et al. Prospective X-ray densitometry and ultrasonography study of the hand bones of patients with rheumatoid arthritis of recent onset. Joint Bone Spine 2001; 68:34-42

Gluer CC, Wu CY, Genant HK. Broadband ultrasound attenuation signals depend on trabucular orientation: An vitro study. Osteoporosis Int 1993; 3: 185-91.

Takano Y, Turner CH, Burr DB. Mineral anisotropy in mineralized tissues is similar along spices and mineral growth occurs independent of collagen orientation in rats: Results from acoustic velocity measurements. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:1292-301.

Hans D, Arlot ME, Schott AM, Roux JP, Kotzki PO, Meunier PJ. DO ultrasound measurements on the os calcis reflect more the bone microarchitecture than the bone mass: A two dimensional histomorphometric study. Bone 1995; 16:295-300.

Hans D, Srivastav SK, Singal C, Barkmann R, Njeh CF, Kantorovich E, et al. Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture? J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14:644-51.

Weiss M,Ben-Shlomo A, Hagag P, Ish-Shalom S. Discrimination of proximal hip fracture by quantitative ultrasound measurement at the radius. Osteoporosis Int 2000;11: 411-6.

Hartman C, Shamir R, Eshach-Adiv O, losilevsky G, Riva B. Assessment of osteoporosis by quantitative ultrasound versus dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in children with chronic rheumatic diseases. The Journal of Rheumatol 2004;31:981-5.

Benitez CL, Schneider DL, Barret-Conner E, Sartoris DJ. Hand ultrasound for osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 2000;11: 203-10.

Massie A, Reid DM, Porter RW. Screening for osteoporosis: Comparasion between dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and broadband ultrasound attenuation in perimenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 1993; 3: 107-10.

Flecher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH. Clinical epidemiology. The essential. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1988: 42-75.

Mazess RB, Hanson JA, Bonnick SL. Ultrasound measurements of the os calcis. Bone 1992; 13: 280-

Van Daele P.L.A.,Burger H, Algra D, Hofman A, Grobbee D.E, Birgenhager JC,et al. Ageassociated changes in ultrasound measurements of the calcaneus in men and women: The Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res1994; 9: 1751-7.

Grampp S, Henk C, Lu Y, Krestan C, Resch H, Kainberger F, et al. Quantitative US of the calcaneus: cutoff levels for the distinction of healthy and osteoporotic individuals. Radiology 2001;220: 400-5.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-20

How to Cite

1.
UARATANAWONG S, UARATANAWONG S, BOONYAVISUT V. DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF ULTRASONOMETER FOR EVALUATION OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN. ASEAN J Radiol [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 20 [cited 2024 May 13];11(1):45-52. Available from: https://asean-journal-radiology.org/index.php/ajr/article/view/724

Issue

Section

Original Article

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.