ATYPICALLY LOCATED SINGLE HOT SPOT IN BONE SCINTIGRAPHY: HOW OFTEN IS IT A METASTASIS?

Authors

  • atcharee PAIJITPRAPAPORN Department of Radiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Chanika SRITARA Department of Radiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University,

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: 1) To identify the frequency of bone metastases which appears as atypically located single hot spot on bone scan in patients with extraosseous malignancy but without current evidence of metastatic bone diseases. 2) To identify the common sites of metastasis with such findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: All bone scans of the patients with extraosseous malignancy but without current evidence of metastatic bone diseases performed at Ramathibodi Hospital during January 1996 to December 1997 were selected. A nuclear medicine physician blindly reviewed the selected scans and only the scans with atypically located single hot spot were included for clarification of their causes. The verification procedure includes histology, CT, MRI, progression of bone scan lesions, or a clinical follow-up of at least 2 years.

RESULTS: During the specified period, there were 100 patients (62 women, 38 men; age range 25-81 years; mean age 57.96 years) with atypically located single hot spot without known skeletal metastasis. Bone metastasis was confirmed in 8 patients (8%); 4 with breast cancer, 2 with cervical carcinoma, and 2 with head and neck cancer. Such findings were classified as benign lesions in 64 patients and as indeterminate in 28 patients. The frequency of a hot spot being a metastatic focus is 2 of 7 (28.57%) at the sternum, | of 28 (3.57%) at the ribs, 1 of 4 (25%) at the costovertebral junction, and 4 of 41 (9.76%) at the lower lumbar spine. None of such findings were proved to be malignant at the cervical spine, the scapula, the manubrium, the sacrum and the sacroiliac joint.

CONCLUSION: The frequency of bone metastasis which appears as atypically located single hot spot on bone scan in patients with extraosseous malignancy but without current evidence of metastatic bone disease was 8%. The most common site of such findings is the sternum, particularly in patients with breast cancer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Mettler FA, Guiberteau MJ. Essentials of nuclear medicine imaging. 3" ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1991.

Thrall JH, Ziessman HA. Nuclear medicine: the requisites. Missouri: MosbyYear Book, Inc, 1995.

Baxter AD, Coakley FV, Finlay DB, West C. The etiology of solitary hot spots in the ribs on planar bone scans. Nucl Med Commun 1995; 16:834-7.

Beadle G, Klaplan WD, Tumeh SS. Clinical significance of solitary rib lesions in patients with extraskeletal malignancy. J Nucl Med 1985; 26:1140-3.

Eisenhuber FE, Leitha T, Puig S, Staudenherz A, Steiner B. Differential diagnosis of atypically located single or double hot spots in whole bone scanning. J Nucl Med 1998; 39:1263-6.

Kwai AK, Stomper PC, Kaplan WD. Clinical significance of isolated scintigraphic sternal lesions in patients with breast cancer. J Nucl Med 1988;29:324-8

Downloads

Published

2023-04-15

How to Cite

1.
PAIJITPRAPAPORN atcharee, SRITARA C. ATYPICALLY LOCATED SINGLE HOT SPOT IN BONE SCINTIGRAPHY: HOW OFTEN IS IT A METASTASIS?. ASEAN J Radiol [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 15 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];8(3):243-8. Available from: https://asean-journal-radiology.org/index.php/ajr/article/view/621

Issue

Section

Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)