JUNCTION PLANE DOSIMETRY IN DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES OF COBALT-60 HEAD AND NECK IRRADIATION

Authors

  • Lalida TUNTIPUMIAMORN Department of Radiology. Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital. Mahidol University
  • Vinai POLWATSATIAN Department of Radiology. Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital. Mahidol University

Abstract

Study of dose at the junction between lateral and anterior field in irradiation technique of head and neck cancer with a Cobalt-60 teletherapy machine was performed in anthropomorphic rando phantom with TLD-100 chips as dosemeters. Doses were compared in three different techniques ; straight field (Technique 1), couch turntable in lateral field (Technique 2) and couch turntable in lateral field with a half beam block device in anterior field ( Technique 3). When normalize dose at any point of the junction as a percentage of the dose at the center of lateral field, the mean doses in Technique | , Technique 2 and Technique 3 are 112.56 ± 13.51%, 103.69 ± 12.29% and 97.20 ± 12.25% respectively. Measurements were done three times in each technique to assess for the setup reproducibility. It was found that only the reproducibility in Technique 1 and 2 was acceptable. This report is an attempt to investigate the dosimetry at the junction plane in different techniques of head and neck irradiation and suggest an appropriate technique which provides a reproducibly uniform dose distribution across JAN. - APR. 2001. Volume VII Number| the junction of head and neck irradiation with the Cobalt-60 teletherapy machine.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bentel GC. Treatment planning - head and neck region. In: Radiation therapy planning. Second edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, USA, 1996: 268-330

Griffiths SE, Short CA, Jackson C, Ash D. Head and neck techniques. In: Radiotherapy principles to practice a manual for quality in treatment delivery. London: Churchchill Livingstone, UK, 1994:189- 197

Sohn J, Suh J, Pohar S. A method for delivery accurate and uniform radiation dosages to the head and neck with asymmetric collimators and a _ single isocenter. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1994: 28: 753-760

Zhu L, Kron T, Barnes K, Johansen S, O’ Brien P. Junctioning of lateral and anterior fields in head and neck cancer: a dosimetric assessment of the monoisocentric technique (including reproducibility). IntJ Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1998: 41(1): 227-232

Bentel GC. Treatment planning — head and neck region. In: Radiation therapy planning. Second edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, USA, 1996:139

Gillin M, Kline R. Field separation between lateral and anterior fields on 6 MV linear accelerator. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1980; 6: 233-237

Sailer SL, Sherouse GW, Chaney EL, Rosenman JG, Tepper JE. A comparison of postoperative techniques for carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx using 3-D dose distributions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1991; 21: 767-777

Williamson TJ. A technique for matching orthogonal megavoltage fields. IntJ Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1979; 5: 111-116

Klein EE, Taylor M, Michaletz-Lorenz M, Zoeller D, Umfleet W. A monoisocentric technique for breast and regional nodal therapy using dual asymmetric jaws. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1994; 28:753-760

Downloads

Published

2023-04-13

How to Cite

1.
TUNTIPUMIAMORN L, POLWATSATIAN V. JUNCTION PLANE DOSIMETRY IN DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES OF COBALT-60 HEAD AND NECK IRRADIATION. ASEAN J Radiol [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 13 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];7(1):81-7. Available from: https://asean-journal-radiology.org/index.php/ajr/article/view/557

Issue

Section

Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)